Chad vs Uzbekistan: Forest area
Chad
3.61 million hectares
in 2025
Uzbekistan
3.89 million hectares
in 2025
Chad rank
83rd
Uzbekistan rank
80th
Forest area over time
- Chad
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 3.89 million hectares against 3.61 million hectares in Chad, a difference of 282,870 hectares.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 83rd and Uzbekistan ranks 80th of 235 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.56 million hectares | 2.73 million hectares | 3.83 million hectares | Chad |
| 2000s | 5.98 million hectares | 3.14 million hectares | 2.85 million hectares | Chad |
| 2010s | 4.95 million hectares | 3.52 million hectares | 1.44 million hectares | Chad |
| 2020s | 3.93 million hectares | 3.79 million hectares | 139,510 hectares | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Chad or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 3.89 million hectares against 3.61 million hectares in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area between Chad and Uzbekistan?
- 282,870 hectares, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Uzbekistan?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Uzbekistan rank globally for forest area?
- Chad ranks 83rd and Uzbekistan ranks 80th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems.