Honduras vs Nepal: Forest area
Honduras
5.86 million hectares
in 2025
Nepal
6.27 million hectares
in 2025
Honduras rank
70th
Nepal rank
69th
Forest area over time
- Honduras
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 6.27 million hectares against 5.86 million hectares in Honduras, a difference of 404,920 hectares.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 69th of 235 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.41 million hectares | 5.82 million hectares | 1.59 million hectares | Honduras |
| 2000s | 6.96 million hectares | 5.99 million hectares | 965,465 hectares | Honduras |
| 2010s | 6.51 million hectares | 6.11 million hectares | 397,619 hectares | Honduras |
| 2020s | 5.99 million hectares | 6.22 million hectares | 237,920 hectares | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Honduras or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 6.27 million hectares against 5.86 million hectares in Honduras as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area between Honduras and Nepal?
- 404,920 hectares, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Nepal?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Honduras and Nepal rank globally for forest area?
- Honduras ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 69th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems.