Lithuania vs Uganda: Forest area
Lithuania
2.22 million hectares
in 2025
Uganda
2.37 million hectares
in 2025
Lithuania rank
105th
Uganda rank
102nd
Forest area over time
- Lithuania
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 2.37 million hectares against 2.22 million hectares in Lithuania, a difference of 151,330 hectares.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 105th and Uganda ranks 102nd of 235 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.98 million hectares | 4.03 million hectares | 2.05 million hectares | Uganda |
| 2000s | 2.09 million hectares | 3.18 million hectares | 1.09 million hectares | Uganda |
| 2010s | 2.18 million hectares | 2.70 million hectares | 510,825 hectares | Uganda |
| 2020s | 2.21 million hectares | 2.44 million hectares | 228,650 hectares | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Lithuania or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 2.37 million hectares against 2.22 million hectares in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area between Lithuania and Uganda?
- 151,330 hectares, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Uganda?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Uganda rank globally for forest area?
- Lithuania ranks 105th and Uganda ranks 102nd of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems.