Nauru vs Saint Barthelemy: Forest area
Nauru
0 hectares
in 2025
Saint Barthelemy
170 hectares
in 2025
Nauru rank
229th
Saint Barthelemy rank
226th
Forest area over time
- Nauru
- Saint Barthelemy
How they compare
Saint Barthelemy currently reports 170 hectares against 0 hectares in Nauru, a difference of 170 hectares.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Saint Barthelemy has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 229th and Saint Barthelemy ranks 226th of 235 countries.
Saint Barthelemy has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Saint Barthelemy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 hectares | 170 hectares | 170 hectares | Saint Barthelemy |
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 170 hectares | 170 hectares | Saint Barthelemy |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 170 hectares | 170 hectares | Saint Barthelemy |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 170 hectares | 170 hectares | Saint Barthelemy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Nauru or Saint Barthelemy?
- Saint Barthelemy, at 170 hectares against 0 hectares in Nauru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area between Nauru and Saint Barthelemy?
- 170 hectares, with Saint Barthelemy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Saint Barthelemy?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Nauru and Saint Barthelemy rank globally for forest area?
- Nauru ranks 229th and Saint Barthelemy ranks 226th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems.