Angola vs Malawi: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Angola
55,640 hectares
in 2025
Malawi
59,030 hectares
in 2025
Angola rank
117th
Malawi rank
114th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Angola
  • Malawi
050.0k100.0k150.0k199020072025

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 59,030 hectares against 55,640 hectares in Angola, a difference of 3,390 hectares.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 117th and Malawi ranks 114th of 185 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 105,597 hectares 129,605 hectares 24,008 hectares Malawi
2000s 82,354 hectares 108,460 hectares 26,106 hectares Malawi
2010s 62,216 hectares 87,280 hectares 25,064 hectares Malawi
2020s 56,765 hectares 67,365 hectares 10,600 hectares Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Angola or Malawi?
Malawi, at 59,030 hectares against 55,640 hectares in Angola as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Angola and Malawi?
3,390 hectares, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Malawi?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Angola and Malawi rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Angola ranks 117th and Malawi ranks 114th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Malawi: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/angola/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/angola/malawi/">Angola vs Malawi: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed