Armenia vs Moldova: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Armenia
200,350 hectares
in 2025
Moldova
209,600 hectares
in 2025
Armenia rank
81st
Moldova rank
80th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Armenia
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 209,600 hectares against 200,350 hectares in Armenia, a difference of 9,250 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 81st and Moldova ranks 80th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Moldova in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 200,152 hectares | 151,130 hectares | 49,022 hectares | Armenia |
| 2000s | 199,491 hectares | 180,650 hectares | 18,841 hectares | Armenia |
| 2010s | 200,353 hectares | 215,190 hectares | 14,837 hectares | Moldova |
| 2020s | 200,280 hectares | 210,400 hectares | 10,120 hectares | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Armenia or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 209,600 hectares against 200,350 hectares in Armenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Armenia and Moldova?
- 9,250 hectares, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Moldova?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Armenia and Moldova rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Armenia ranks 81st and Moldova ranks 80th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.