Australia vs Belarus: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Australia
2.06 million hectares
in 2025
Belarus
2.27 million hectares
in 2025
Australia rank
29th
Belarus rank
27th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Australia
  • Belarus
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M199020072025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 2.27 million hectares against 2.06 million hectares in Australia, a difference of 208,250 hectares.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Australia ranks 29th and Belarus ranks 27th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 1.28 million hectares 1.56 million hectares 288,046 hectares Belarus
2000s 1.86 million hectares 1.99 million hectares 130,575 hectares Belarus
2010s 2.25 million hectares 2.20 million hectares 57,470 hectares Australia
2020s 2.07 million hectares 2.25 million hectares 176,665 hectares Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Australia or Belarus?
Belarus, at 2.27 million hectares against 2.06 million hectares in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Australia and Belarus?
208,250 hectares, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belarus?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Australia and Belarus rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Australia ranks 29th and Belarus ranks 27th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Belarus: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/australia/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/australia/belarus/">Australia vs Belarus: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed