Azerbaijan vs Zimbabwe: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Azerbaijan
308,030 hectares
in 2025
Zimbabwe
320,750 hectares
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
70th
Zimbabwe rank
68th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199020072025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 320,750 hectares against 308,030 hectares in Azerbaijan, a difference of 12,720 hectares.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 185 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 300,114 hectares 375,924 hectares 75,810 hectares Zimbabwe
2000s 298,417 hectares 353,752 hectares 55,335 hectares Zimbabwe
2010s 309,153 hectares 334,069 hectares 24,916 hectares Zimbabwe
2020s 305,860 hectares 323,835 hectares 17,975 hectares Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Azerbaijan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 320,750 hectares against 308,030 hectares in Azerbaijan as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe?
12,720 hectares, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Azerbaijan ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Zimbabwe: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/azerbaijan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/azerbaijan/zimbabwe/">Azerbaijan vs Zimbabwe: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed