Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Bangladesh
330,350 hectares
in 2025
Rwanda
397,350 hectares
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
65th
Rwanda rank
62nd

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Rwanda
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199020072025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 397,350 hectares against 330,350 hectares in Bangladesh, a difference of 67,000 hectares.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 65th and Rwanda ranks 62nd of 185 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 83,200 hectares 239,592 hectares 156,392 hectares Rwanda
2000s 73,712 hectares 261,238 hectares 187,526 hectares Rwanda
2010s 149,466 hectares 313,137 hectares 163,671 hectares Rwanda
2020s 287,280 hectares 377,300 hectares 90,020 hectares Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Bangladesh or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 397,350 hectares against 330,350 hectares in Bangladesh as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Bangladesh and Rwanda?
67,000 hectares, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Rwanda?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Rwanda rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Bangladesh ranks 65th and Rwanda ranks 62nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/bangladesh/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/bangladesh/rwanda/">Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed