Belarus vs Malaysia: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Belarus
2.27 million hectares
in 2025
Malaysia
2.36 million hectares
in 2025
Belarus rank
27th
Malaysia rank
25th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Belarus
  • Malaysia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M199020072025

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 2.36 million hectares against 2.27 million hectares in Belarus, a difference of 93,510 hectares.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malaysia ahead.

Belarus ranks 27th and Malaysia ranks 25th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.56 million hectares 1.77 million hectares 200,806 hectares Malaysia
2000s 1.99 million hectares 1.48 million hectares 505,010 hectares Belarus
2010s 2.20 million hectares 1.66 million hectares 535,779 hectares Belarus
2020s 2.25 million hectares 2.21 million hectares 34,790 hectares Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Belarus or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 2.36 million hectares against 2.27 million hectares in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Belarus and Malaysia?
93,510 hectares, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Malaysia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Malaysia rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Belarus ranks 27th and Malaysia ranks 25th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Malaysia: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/belarus/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/belarus/malaysia/">Belarus vs Malaysia: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed