Belgium vs Kazakhstan: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Belgium
427,220 hectares
in 2025
Kazakhstan
430,910 hectares
in 2025
Belgium rank
60th
Kazakhstan rank
58th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Belgium
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 430,910 hectares against 427,220 hectares in Belgium, a difference of 3,690 hectares.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Belgium ranks 60th and Kazakhstan ranks 58th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 407,212 hectares | 490,837 hectares | 83,626 hectares | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 426,455 hectares | 428,235 hectares | 1,780 hectares | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 427,220 hectares | 426,655 hectares | 565 hectares | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Belgium or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 430,910 hectares against 427,220 hectares in Belgium as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Belgium and Kazakhstan?
- 3,690 hectares, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Kazakhstan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Kazakhstan rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Belgium ranks 60th and Kazakhstan ranks 58th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.