Belgium vs Uganda: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Belgium
427,220 hectares
in 2025
Uganda
514,350 hectares
in 2025
Belgium rank
60th
Uganda rank
57th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Belgium
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 514,350 hectares against 427,220 hectares in Belgium, a difference of 87,130 hectares.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 60th and Uganda ranks 57th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 407,212 hectares | 312,640 hectares | 94,572 hectares | Belgium |
| 2010s | 426,455 hectares | 411,040 hectares | 15,415 hectares | Belgium |
| 2020s | 427,220 hectares | 489,755 hectares | 62,535 hectares | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Belgium or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 514,350 hectares against 427,220 hectares in Belgium as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Belgium and Uganda?
- 87,130 hectares, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Uganda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Uganda rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Belgium ranks 60th and Uganda ranks 57th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.