Bolivia vs Burundi: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Bolivia
116,250 hectares
in 2025
Burundi
112,970 hectares
in 2025
Bolivia rank
101st
Burundi rank
103rd
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Bolivia
- Burundi
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 116,250 hectares against 112,970 hectares in Burundi, a difference of 3,280 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burundi ahead.
Bolivia ranks 101st and Burundi ranks 103rd of 185 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26,777 hectares | 139,596 hectares | 112,818 hectares | Burundi |
| 2000s | 41,842 hectares | 112,970 hectares | 71,128 hectares | Burundi |
| 2010s | 62,472 hectares | 112,970 hectares | 50,498 hectares | Burundi |
| 2020s | 105,520 hectares | 112,970 hectares | 7,450 hectares | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Bolivia or Burundi?
- Bolivia, at 116,250 hectares against 112,970 hectares in Burundi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Bolivia and Burundi?
- 3,280 hectares, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Burundi?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Bolivia and Burundi rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Bolivia ranks 101st and Burundi ranks 103rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.