Bolivia vs Ecuador: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Bolivia
116,250 hectares
in 2025
Ecuador
120,150 hectares
in 2025
Bolivia rank
101st
Ecuador rank
98th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Bolivia
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 120,150 hectares against 116,250 hectares in Bolivia, a difference of 3,900 hectares.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 101st and Ecuador ranks 98th of 185 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26,777 hectares | 56,010 hectares | 29,232 hectares | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 41,842 hectares | 76,752 hectares | 34,910 hectares | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 62,472 hectares | 113,080 hectares | 50,608 hectares | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 105,520 hectares | 120,535 hectares | 15,015 hectares | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Bolivia or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 120,150 hectares against 116,250 hectares in Bolivia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Bolivia and Ecuador?
- 3,900 hectares, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Ecuador?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Bolivia and Ecuador rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Bolivia ranks 101st and Ecuador ranks 98th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.