Bolivia vs Guinea: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Bolivia
116,250 hectares
in 2025
Guinea
111,450 hectares
in 2025
Bolivia rank
101st
Guinea rank
104th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Bolivia
- Guinea
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 116,250 hectares against 111,450 hectares in Guinea, a difference of 4,800 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea ahead.
Bolivia ranks 101st and Guinea ranks 104th of 185 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26,777 hectares | 53,755 hectares | 26,978 hectares | Guinea |
| 2000s | 41,842 hectares | 74,855 hectares | 33,014 hectares | Guinea |
| 2010s | 62,472 hectares | 95,733 hectares | 33,261 hectares | Guinea |
| 2020s | 105,520 hectares | 108,950 hectares | 3,430 hectares | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Bolivia or Guinea?
- Bolivia, at 116,250 hectares against 111,450 hectares in Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Bolivia and Guinea?
- 4,800 hectares, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Guinea?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Bolivia and Guinea rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Bolivia ranks 101st and Guinea ranks 104th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.