Bolivia vs Nicaragua: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Bolivia
116,250 hectares
in 2025
Nicaragua
118,396 hectares
in 2023
Bolivia rank
101st
Nicaragua rank
99th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Bolivia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 118,396 hectares against 116,250 hectares in Bolivia, a difference of 2,146 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 101st and Nicaragua ranks 99th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 2 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42,595 hectares | 13,070 hectares | 29,525 hectares | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 62,472 hectares | 59,711 hectares | 2,761 hectares | Bolivia |
| 2020s | 101,228 hectares | 108,283 hectares | 7,055 hectares | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Bolivia or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 118,396 hectares against 116,250 hectares in Bolivia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Bolivia and Nicaragua?
- 2,146 hectares, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Nicaragua?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Bolivia and Nicaragua rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Bolivia ranks 101st and Nicaragua ranks 99th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.