Bolivia vs Norway: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Bolivia
116,250 hectares
in 2025
Norway
113,110 hectares
in 2025
Bolivia rank
101st
Norway rank
102nd
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Bolivia
- Norway
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 116,250 hectares against 113,110 hectares in Norway, a difference of 3,140 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Norway ahead.
Bolivia ranks 101st and Norway ranks 102nd of 185 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26,777 hectares | 115,540 hectares | 88,763 hectares | Norway |
| 2000s | 41,842 hectares | 115,540 hectares | 73,698 hectares | Norway |
| 2010s | 62,472 hectares | 113,884 hectares | 51,412 hectares | Norway |
| 2020s | 105,520 hectares | 113,110 hectares | 7,590 hectares | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Bolivia or Norway?
- Bolivia, at 116,250 hectares against 113,110 hectares in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Bolivia and Norway?
- 3,140 hectares, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Norway?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Bolivia and Norway rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Bolivia ranks 101st and Norway ranks 102nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.