Bulgaria vs South Sudan: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Bulgaria
734,000 hectares
in 2025
South Sudan
715,700 hectares
in 2025
Bulgaria rank
43rd
South Sudan rank
44th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Bulgaria
- South Sudan
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 734,000 hectares against 715,700 hectares in South Sudan, a difference of 18,300 hectares.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Bulgaria has been ahead every year.
Bulgaria ranks 43rd and South Sudan ranks 44th of 185 countries.
Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 811,700 hectares | 715,700 hectares | 96,000 hectares | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 756,500 hectares | 715,700 hectares | 40,800 hectares | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Bulgaria or South Sudan?
- Bulgaria, at 734,000 hectares against 715,700 hectares in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Bulgaria and South Sudan?
- 18,300 hectares, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Bulgaria and South Sudan rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Bulgaria ranks 43rd and South Sudan ranks 44th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.