Burkina Faso vs Isle of Man: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Burkina Faso
3,450 hectares
in 2025
Isle of Man
3,500 hectares
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
159th
Isle of Man rank
158th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Isle of Man
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k199020072025

How they compare

Isle of Man currently reports 3,500 hectares against 3,450 hectares in Burkina Faso, a difference of 50 hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 159th and Isle of Man ranks 158th of 185 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Isle of Man Difference Ahead
1990s 11,120 hectares 3,460 hectares 7,660 hectares Burkina Faso
2000s 10,377 hectares 3,460 hectares 6,917 hectares Burkina Faso
2010s 7,236 hectares 3,468 hectares 3,768 hectares Burkina Faso
2020s 4,350 hectares 3,500 hectares 850 hectares Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Burkina Faso or Isle of Man?
Isle of Man, at 3,500 hectares against 3,450 hectares in Burkina Faso as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Burkina Faso and Isle of Man?
50 hectares, with Isle of Man ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Isle of Man?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Isle of Man rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Burkina Faso ranks 159th and Isle of Man ranks 158th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Isle of Man: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/burkina-faso/isle-of-man/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/burkina-faso/isle-of-man/">Burkina Faso vs Isle of Man: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed