Burundi vs Norway: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Burundi
112,970 hectares
in 2025
Norway
113,110 hectares
in 2025
Burundi rank
103rd
Norway rank
102nd
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Burundi
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 113,110 hectares against 112,970 hectares in Burundi, a difference of 140 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 103rd and Norway ranks 102nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 139,596 hectares | 115,540 hectares | 24,056 hectares | Burundi |
| 2000s | 112,970 hectares | 115,540 hectares | 2,570 hectares | Norway |
| 2010s | 112,970 hectares | 113,884 hectares | 914 hectares | Norway |
| 2020s | 112,970 hectares | 113,110 hectares | 140 hectares | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Burundi or Norway?
- Norway, at 113,110 hectares against 112,970 hectares in Burundi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Burundi and Norway?
- 140 hectares, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Norway?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Burundi and Norway rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Burundi ranks 103rd and Norway ranks 102nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.