Chile vs Nigeria: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Chile
3.15 million hectares
in 2025
Nigeria
2.66 million hectares
in 2025
Chile rank
16th
Nigeria rank
19th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Chile
  • Nigeria
01.0M2.0M3.0M199020072025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 3.15 million hectares against 2.66 million hectares in Nigeria, a difference of 496,560 hectares.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nigeria ahead.

Chile ranks 16th and Nigeria ranks 19th of 185 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Nigeria Difference Ahead
1990s 1.84 million hectares 1.75 million hectares 97,058 hectares Chile
2000s 2.55 million hectares 2.05 million hectares 500,698 hectares Chile
2010s 3.09 million hectares 2.34 million hectares 742,860 hectares Chile
2020s 3.16 million hectares 2.58 million hectares 577,280 hectares Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Chile or Nigeria?
Chile, at 3.15 million hectares against 2.66 million hectares in Nigeria as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Chile and Nigeria?
496,560 hectares, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nigeria?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Chile and Nigeria rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Chile ranks 16th and Nigeria ranks 19th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Nigeria: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/chile/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/chile/nigeria/">Chile vs Nigeria: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed