Chile vs United Kingdom: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Chile
3.15 million hectares
in 2025
United Kingdom
2.93 million hectares
in 2025
Chile rank
16th
United Kingdom rank
17th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Chile
  • United Kingdom
01.0M2.0M3.0M199020072025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 3.15 million hectares against 2.93 million hectares in United Kingdom, a difference of 220,430 hectares.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times United Kingdom's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Chile ranks 16th and United Kingdom ranks 17th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and United Kingdom in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1990s 1.84 million hectares 2.51 million hectares 669,582 hectares United Kingdom
2000s 2.55 million hectares 2.66 million hectares 111,192 hectares United Kingdom
2010s 3.09 million hectares 2.79 million hectares 292,823 hectares Chile
2020s 3.16 million hectares 2.90 million hectares 257,960 hectares Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Chile or United Kingdom?
Chile, at 3.15 million hectares against 2.93 million hectares in United Kingdom as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Chile and United Kingdom?
220,430 hectares, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and United Kingdom?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Chile and United Kingdom rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Chile ranks 16th and United Kingdom ranks 17th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs United Kingdom: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/chile/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/chile/united-kingdom/">Chile vs United Kingdom: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed