Colombia vs Tanzania: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Colombia
541,120 hectares
in 2025
Tanzania
553,040 hectares
in 2025
Colombia rank
55th
Tanzania rank
54th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Colombia
  • Tanzania
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k199020072025

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 553,040 hectares against 541,120 hectares in Colombia, a difference of 11,920 hectares.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 55th and Tanzania ranks 54th of 185 countries.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 127,915 hectares 553,040 hectares 425,125 hectares Tanzania
2000s 277,286 hectares 553,040 hectares 275,754 hectares Tanzania
2010s 462,967 hectares 553,040 hectares 90,073 hectares Tanzania
2020s 540,775 hectares 553,040 hectares 12,265 hectares Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Colombia or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 553,040 hectares against 541,120 hectares in Colombia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Colombia and Tanzania?
11,920 hectares, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Tanzania?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Colombia and Tanzania rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Colombia ranks 55th and Tanzania ranks 54th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Tanzania: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/colombia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/colombia/tanzania/">Colombia vs Tanzania: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed