Colombia vs Uganda: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Colombia
541,120 hectares
in 2025
Uganda
514,350 hectares
in 2025
Colombia rank
55th
Uganda rank
57th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Colombia
  • Uganda
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k199020072025

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 541,120 hectares against 514,350 hectares in Uganda, a difference of 26,770 hectares.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uganda ahead.

Colombia ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 57th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 127,915 hectares 214,246 hectares 86,330 hectares Uganda
2000s 277,286 hectares 312,640 hectares 35,354 hectares Uganda
2010s 462,967 hectares 411,040 hectares 51,927 hectares Colombia
2020s 540,775 hectares 489,755 hectares 51,020 hectares Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Colombia or Uganda?
Colombia, at 541,120 hectares against 514,350 hectares in Uganda as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Colombia and Uganda?
26,770 hectares, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Uganda?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Colombia and Uganda rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Colombia ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 57th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Uganda: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/colombia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/colombia/uganda/">Colombia vs Uganda: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed