Comoros vs Egypt: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Comoros
1,760 hectares
in 2025
Egypt
3,410 hectares
in 2025
Comoros rank
163rd
Egypt rank
160th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Comoros
  • Egypt
1.0k2.0k3.0k199020072025

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 3,410 hectares against 1,760 hectares in Comoros, a difference of 1,650 hectares.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.9 times Comoros's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 163rd and Egypt ranks 160th of 185 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Egypt Difference Ahead
1990s 2,410 hectares 3,380 hectares 970 hectares Egypt
2000s 1,915 hectares 3,380 hectares 1,465 hectares Egypt
2010s 1,025 hectares 3,380 hectares 2,355 hectares Egypt
2020s 1,510 hectares 3,395 hectares 1,885 hectares Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Comoros or Egypt?
Egypt, at 3,410 hectares against 1,760 hectares in Comoros as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Comoros and Egypt?
1,650 hectares, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Egypt?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Comoros and Egypt rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Comoros ranks 163rd and Egypt ranks 160th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs Egypt: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/comoros/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/comoros/egypt-arab-rep/">Comoros vs Egypt: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed