Congo vs Eswatini: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Congo
134,100 hectares
in 2025
Eswatini
145,210 hectares
in 2025
Congo rank
93rd
Eswatini rank
91st

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Congo
  • Eswatini
050.0k100.0k150.0k199020072025

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 145,210 hectares against 134,100 hectares in Congo, a difference of 11,110 hectares.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 93rd and Eswatini ranks 91st of 185 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 59,100 hectares 145,210 hectares 86,110 hectares Eswatini
2000s 59,100 hectares 145,210 hectares 86,110 hectares Eswatini
2010s 59,100 hectares 145,210 hectares 86,110 hectares Eswatini
2020s 96,600 hectares 145,210 hectares 48,610 hectares Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Congo or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 145,210 hectares against 134,100 hectares in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Congo and Eswatini?
11,110 hectares, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Congo and Eswatini rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Congo ranks 93rd and Eswatini ranks 91st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Eswatini: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/congo-rep/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/congo-rep/eswatini/">Congo vs Eswatini: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed