Costa Rica vs Samoa: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Costa Rica
44,920 hectares
in 2025
Samoa
46,180 hectares
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
123rd
Samoa rank
122nd

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Samoa
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199020072025

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 46,180 hectares against 44,920 hectares in Costa Rica, a difference of 1,260 hectares.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Samoa ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 123rd and Samoa ranks 122nd of 185 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Samoa Difference Ahead
1990s 56,260 hectares 50,182 hectares 6,078 hectares Costa Rica
2000s 102,564 hectares 48,852 hectares 53,712 hectares Costa Rica
2010s 73,683 hectares 47,530 hectares 26,153 hectares Costa Rica
2020s 52,325 hectares 46,500 hectares 5,825 hectares Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Costa Rica or Samoa?
Samoa, at 46,180 hectares against 44,920 hectares in Costa Rica as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Costa Rica and Samoa?
1,260 hectares, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Samoa?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Samoa rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Costa Rica ranks 123rd and Samoa ranks 122nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Samoa: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/costa-rica/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/costa-rica/samoa/">Costa Rica vs Samoa: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed