Cuba vs Romania: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Cuba
659,390 hectares
in 2025
Romania
676,440 hectares
in 2025
Cuba rank
48th
Romania rank
47th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Cuba
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 676,440 hectares against 659,390 hectares in Cuba, a difference of 17,050 hectares.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Cuba ranks 48th and Romania ranks 47th of 185 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 384,992 hectares | 528,000 hectares | 143,008 hectares | Romania |
| 2000s | 453,024 hectares | 533,400 hectares | 80,376 hectares | Romania |
| 2010s | 629,019 hectares | 819,259 hectares | 190,240 hectares | Romania |
| 2020s | 654,730 hectares | 785,755 hectares | 131,025 hectares | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Cuba or Romania?
- Romania, at 676,440 hectares against 659,390 hectares in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Cuba and Romania?
- 17,050 hectares, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Romania?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Romania rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Cuba ranks 48th and Romania ranks 47th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.