Denmark vs Rwanda: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Denmark
430,250 hectares
in 2025
Rwanda
397,350 hectares
in 2025
Denmark rank
59th
Rwanda rank
62nd

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Denmark
  • Rwanda
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k199020072025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 430,250 hectares against 397,350 hectares in Rwanda, a difference of 32,900 hectares.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 59th and Rwanda ranks 62nd of 185 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 402,692 hectares 239,592 hectares 163,100 hectares Denmark
2000s 431,413 hectares 261,238 hectares 170,174 hectares Denmark
2010s 442,488 hectares 313,137 hectares 129,351 hectares Denmark
2020s 428,855 hectares 377,300 hectares 51,555 hectares Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Denmark or Rwanda?
Denmark, at 430,250 hectares against 397,350 hectares in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Denmark and Rwanda?
32,900 hectares, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Rwanda?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Rwanda rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Denmark ranks 59th and Rwanda ranks 62nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Rwanda: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/denmark/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/denmark/rwanda/">Denmark vs Rwanda: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed