Ecuador vs Sudan: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Ecuador
120,150 hectares
in 2025
Sudan
130,250 hectares
in 2025
Ecuador rank
98th
Sudan rank
95th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Ecuador
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 130,250 hectares against 120,150 hectares in Ecuador, a difference of 10,100 hectares.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 98th and Sudan ranks 95th of 185 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 119,093 hectares | 130,250 hectares | 11,157 hectares | Sudan |
| 2020s | 120,535 hectares | 130,250 hectares | 9,715 hectares | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Ecuador or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 130,250 hectares against 120,150 hectares in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Ecuador and Sudan?
- 10,100 hectares, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Sudan rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Ecuador ranks 98th and Sudan ranks 95th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.