Eritrea vs French Polynesia: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Eritrea
10,000 hectares
in 2025
French Polynesia
9,460 hectares
in 2025
Eritrea rank
143rd
French Polynesia rank
144th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Eritrea
  • French Polynesia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199020072025

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 10,000 hectares against 9,460 hectares in French Polynesia, a difference of 540 hectares.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times French Polynesia's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 143rd and French Polynesia ranks 144th of 185 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea French Polynesia Difference Ahead
1990s 10,000 hectares 6,902 hectares 3,098 hectares Eritrea
2000s 10,000 hectares 8,960 hectares 1,040 hectares Eritrea
2010s 10,000 hectares 9,460 hectares 540 hectares Eritrea
2020s 10,000 hectares 9,460 hectares 540 hectares Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Eritrea or French Polynesia?
Eritrea, at 10,000 hectares against 9,460 hectares in French Polynesia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Eritrea and French Polynesia?
540 hectares, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and French Polynesia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Eritrea and French Polynesia rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Eritrea ranks 143rd and French Polynesia ranks 144th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs French Polynesia: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/eritrea/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/eritrea/french-polynesia/">Eritrea vs French Polynesia: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed