Eritrea vs Suriname: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Eritrea
10,000 hectares
in 2025
Suriname
14,150 hectares
in 2025
Eritrea rank
143rd
Suriname rank
140th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Eritrea
  • Suriname
05.0k10.0k15.0k199020072025

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 14,150 hectares against 10,000 hectares in Eritrea, a difference of 4,150 hectares.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.4 times Eritrea's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 143rd and Suriname ranks 140th of 185 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 10,000 hectares 14,150 hectares 4,150 hectares Suriname
2000s 10,000 hectares 14,150 hectares 4,150 hectares Suriname
2010s 10,000 hectares 14,150 hectares 4,150 hectares Suriname
2020s 10,000 hectares 14,150 hectares 4,150 hectares Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Eritrea or Suriname?
Suriname, at 14,150 hectares against 10,000 hectares in Eritrea as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Eritrea and Suriname?
4,150 hectares, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Suriname?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Eritrea and Suriname rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Eritrea ranks 143rd and Suriname ranks 140th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Suriname: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/eritrea/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/eritrea/suriname/">Eritrea vs Suriname: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed