Ethiopia vs Hungary: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Ethiopia
968,500 hectares
in 2025
Hungary
791,690 hectares
in 2025
Ethiopia rank
38th
Hungary rank
40th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Hungary
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M199020072025

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 968,500 hectares against 791,690 hectares in Hungary, a difference of 176,810 hectares.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Hungary ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 38th and Hungary ranks 40th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 353,580 hectares 728,574 hectares 374,994 hectares Hungary
2000s 514,485 hectares 767,075 hectares 252,590 hectares Hungary
2010s 705,870 hectares 790,705 hectares 84,835 hectares Hungary
2020s 917,100 hectares 786,265 hectares 130,835 hectares Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Ethiopia or Hungary?
Ethiopia, at 968,500 hectares against 791,690 hectares in Hungary as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Ethiopia and Hungary?
176,810 hectares, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Hungary?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Ethiopia and Hungary rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Ethiopia ranks 38th and Hungary ranks 40th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Hungary: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/ethiopia/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/ethiopia/hungary/">Ethiopia vs Hungary: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed