Ethiopia vs Uruguay: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Ethiopia
968,500 hectares
in 2025
Uruguay
1.17 million hectares
in 2025
Ethiopia rank
38th
Uruguay rank
36th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Uruguay
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M1.2M199020072025

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 1.17 million hectares against 968,500 hectares in Ethiopia, a difference of 198,500 hectares.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia ranks 38th and Uruguay ranks 36th of 185 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 353,580 hectares 430,906 hectares 77,326 hectares Uruguay
2000s 514,485 hectares 721,078 hectares 206,594 hectares Uruguay
2010s 705,870 hectares 976,243 hectares 270,373 hectares Uruguay
2020s 917,100 hectares 1.13 million hectares 209,955 hectares Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Ethiopia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 1.17 million hectares against 968,500 hectares in Ethiopia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Ethiopia and Uruguay?
198,500 hectares, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Uruguay?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Ethiopia and Uruguay rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Ethiopia ranks 38th and Uruguay ranks 36th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Uruguay: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/ethiopia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/ethiopia/uruguay/">Ethiopia vs Uruguay: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed