Fiji vs Serbia: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Fiji
227,410 hectares
in 2025
Serbia
224,080 hectares
in 2025
Fiji rank
77th
Serbia rank
79th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Fiji
- Serbia
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 227,410 hectares against 224,080 hectares in Serbia, a difference of 3,330 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Fiji ranks 77th and Serbia ranks 79th of 185 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 156,005 hectares | 180,938 hectares | 24,932 hectares | Serbia |
| 2010s | 184,499 hectares | 198,197 hectares | 13,698 hectares | Serbia |
| 2020s | 217,155 hectares | 217,920 hectares | 765 hectares | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Fiji or Serbia?
- Fiji, at 227,410 hectares against 224,080 hectares in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Fiji and Serbia?
- 3,330 hectares, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Serbia rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Fiji ranks 77th and Serbia ranks 79th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.