French Polynesia vs Lesotho: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

French Polynesia
9,460 hectares
in 2025
Lesotho
8,670 hectares
in 2025
French Polynesia rank
144th
Lesotho rank
146th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Lesotho
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199020072025

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 9,460 hectares against 8,670 hectares in Lesotho, a difference of 790 hectares.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lesotho ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 144th and Lesotho ranks 146th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 3 and Lesotho in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Lesotho Difference Ahead
1990s 6,284 hectares 8,670 hectares 2,386 hectares Lesotho
2000s 8,960 hectares 8,670 hectares 289.5 hectares French Polynesia
2010s 9,460 hectares 8,670 hectares 790 hectares French Polynesia
2020s 9,460 hectares 8,670 hectares 790 hectares French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, French Polynesia or Lesotho?
French Polynesia, at 9,460 hectares against 8,670 hectares in Lesotho as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between French Polynesia and Lesotho?
790 hectares, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Lesotho?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do French Polynesia and Lesotho rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
French Polynesia ranks 144th and Lesotho ranks 146th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Lesotho: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/french-polynesia/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/french-polynesia/lesotho/">French Polynesia vs Lesotho: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed