French Polynesia vs East Timor: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

French Polynesia
9,460 hectares
in 2025
East Timor
11,730 hectares
in 2025
French Polynesia rank
144th
East Timor rank
142nd

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • French Polynesia
  • East Timor
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199020072025

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 11,730 hectares against 9,460 hectares in French Polynesia, a difference of 2,270 hectares.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.2 times French Polynesia's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

French Polynesia ranks 144th and East Timor ranks 142nd of 185 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia East Timor Difference Ahead
1990s 6,284 hectares 11,730 hectares 5,446 hectares East Timor
2000s 8,960 hectares 11,730 hectares 2,770 hectares East Timor
2010s 9,460 hectares 11,730 hectares 2,270 hectares East Timor
2020s 9,460 hectares 11,730 hectares 2,270 hectares East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, French Polynesia or East Timor?
East Timor, at 11,730 hectares against 9,460 hectares in French Polynesia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between French Polynesia and East Timor?
2,270 hectares, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and East Timor?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do French Polynesia and East Timor rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
French Polynesia ranks 144th and East Timor ranks 142nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs East Timor: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/french-polynesia/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/french-polynesia/timor-leste/">French Polynesia vs East Timor: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed