Georgia vs Iceland: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Georgia
46,510 hectares
in 2025
Iceland
49,470 hectares
in 2025
Georgia rank
121st
Iceland rank
119th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Georgia
  • Iceland
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199020072025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 49,470 hectares against 46,510 hectares in Georgia, a difference of 2,960 hectares.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 121st and Iceland ranks 119th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Iceland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 46,510 hectares 15,043 hectares 31,467 hectares Georgia
2000s 46,510 hectares 28,520 hectares 17,990 hectares Georgia
2010s 46,510 hectares 41,010 hectares 5,500 hectares Georgia
2020s 46,510 hectares 47,170 hectares 660 hectares Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Georgia or Iceland?
Iceland, at 49,470 hectares against 46,510 hectares in Georgia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Georgia and Iceland?
2,960 hectares, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Iceland?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Iceland rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Georgia ranks 121st and Iceland ranks 119th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Iceland: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/georgia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/georgia/iceland/">Georgia vs Iceland: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed