Georgia vs Samoa: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Georgia
46,510 hectares
in 2025
Samoa
46,180 hectares
in 2025
Georgia rank
121st
Samoa rank
122nd
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Georgia
- Samoa
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 46,510 hectares against 46,180 hectares in Samoa, a difference of 330 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Samoa ahead.
Georgia ranks 121st and Samoa ranks 122nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 46,510 hectares | 50,048 hectares | 3,538 hectares | Samoa |
| 2000s | 46,510 hectares | 48,852 hectares | 2,342 hectares | Samoa |
| 2010s | 46,510 hectares | 47,530 hectares | 1,020 hectares | Samoa |
| 2020s | 46,510 hectares | 46,500 hectares | 10 hectares | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Georgia or Samoa?
- Georgia, at 46,510 hectares against 46,180 hectares in Samoa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Georgia and Samoa?
- 330 hectares, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Samoa?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Samoa rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Georgia ranks 121st and Samoa ranks 122nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.