Ghana vs Zimbabwe: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Ghana
300,860 hectares
in 2025
Zimbabwe
320,750 hectares
in 2025
Ghana rank
71st
Zimbabwe rank
68th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Ghana
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199020072025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 320,750 hectares against 300,860 hectares in Ghana, a difference of 19,890 hectares.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Ghana ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 185 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 57,258 hectares 378,386 hectares 321,128 hectares Zimbabwe
2000s 105,842 hectares 353,752 hectares 247,910 hectares Zimbabwe
2010s 197,926 hectares 334,069 hectares 136,143 hectares Zimbabwe
2020s 287,010 hectares 323,835 hectares 36,825 hectares Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Ghana or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 320,750 hectares against 300,860 hectares in Ghana as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Ghana and Zimbabwe?
19,890 hectares, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Zimbabwe?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Ghana and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Ghana ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Zimbabwe: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/ghana/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/ghana/zimbabwe/">Ghana vs Zimbabwe: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed