Greenland vs Grenada: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Greenland
220 hectares
in 2025
Grenada
210 hectares
in 2025
Greenland rank
177th
Grenada rank
178th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Greenland
- Grenada
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 220 hectares against 210 hectares in Grenada, a difference of 10 hectares.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 177th and Grenada ranks 178th of 185 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 220 hectares | 210 hectares | 10 hectares | Greenland |
| 2000s | 220 hectares | 210 hectares | 10 hectares | Greenland |
| 2010s | 220 hectares | 210 hectares | 10 hectares | Greenland |
| 2020s | 220 hectares | 210 hectares | 10 hectares | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Greenland or Grenada?
- Greenland, at 220 hectares against 210 hectares in Grenada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Greenland and Grenada?
- 10 hectares, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Grenada?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Greenland and Grenada rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Greenland ranks 177th and Grenada ranks 178th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.