Greenland vs Lebanon: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Greenland
220 hectares
in 2025
Lebanon
350 hectares
in 2025
Greenland rank
177th
Lebanon rank
175th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Greenland
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 350 hectares against 220 hectares in Greenland, a difference of 130 hectares.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.6 times Greenland's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 177th and Lebanon ranks 175th of 185 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 220 hectares | 344.5 hectares | 124.5 hectares | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 220 hectares | 350 hectares | 130 hectares | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 220 hectares | 350 hectares | 130 hectares | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 220 hectares | 350 hectares | 130 hectares | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Greenland or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 350 hectares against 220 hectares in Greenland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Greenland and Lebanon?
- 130 hectares, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Lebanon?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Greenland and Lebanon rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Greenland ranks 177th and Lebanon ranks 175th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.