Greenland vs Malta: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Greenland
220 hectares
in 2025
Malta
120 hectares
in 2025
Greenland rank
177th
Malta rank
179th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Greenland
- Malta
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 220 hectares against 120 hectares in Malta, a difference of 100 hectares.
That makes Greenland's figure about 1.8 times Malta's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 177th and Malta ranks 179th of 185 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 220 hectares | 55 hectares | 165 hectares | Greenland |
| 2020s | 220 hectares | 115 hectares | 105 hectares | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Greenland or Malta?
- Greenland, at 220 hectares against 120 hectares in Malta as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Greenland and Malta?
- 100 hectares, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Malta?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
- How do Greenland and Malta rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Greenland ranks 177th and Malta ranks 179th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.