Grenada vs Malta: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Grenada
210 hectares
in 2025
Malta
120 hectares
in 2025
Grenada rank
178th
Malta rank
179th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Grenada
- Malta
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 210 hectares against 120 hectares in Malta, a difference of 90 hectares.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.8 times Malta's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 178th and Malta ranks 179th of 185 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 210 hectares | 55 hectares | 155 hectares | Grenada |
| 2020s | 210 hectares | 115 hectares | 95 hectares | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Grenada or Malta?
- Grenada, at 210 hectares against 120 hectares in Malta as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Grenada and Malta?
- 90 hectares, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Malta?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
- How do Grenada and Malta rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Grenada ranks 178th and Malta ranks 179th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.