Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Guatemala
308,230 hectares
in 2025
Zimbabwe
320,750 hectares
in 2025
Guatemala rank
69th
Zimbabwe rank
68th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Guatemala
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199020072025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 320,750 hectares against 308,230 hectares in Guatemala, a difference of 12,520 hectares.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 185 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 29,850 hectares 378,386 hectares 348,536 hectares Zimbabwe
2000s 70,606 hectares 353,752 hectares 283,146 hectares Zimbabwe
2010s 135,420 hectares 334,069 hectares 198,649 hectares Zimbabwe
2020s 244,155 hectares 323,835 hectares 79,680 hectares Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Guatemala or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 320,750 hectares against 308,230 hectares in Guatemala as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
12,520 hectares, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Guatemala and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Guatemala ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/guatemala/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/guatemala/zimbabwe/">Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed