Guinea vs Israel: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Guinea
111,450 hectares
in 2025
Israel
100,000 hectares
in 2025
Guinea rank
104th
Israel rank
105th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Guinea
  • Israel
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k199020072025

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 111,450 hectares against 100,000 hectares in Israel, a difference of 11,450 hectares.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Israel ahead.

Guinea ranks 104th and Israel ranks 105th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Israel in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Israel Difference Ahead
1990s 53,755 hectares 75,900 hectares 22,145 hectares Israel
2000s 74,855 hectares 88,000 hectares 13,145 hectares Israel
2010s 95,733 hectares 87,900 hectares 7,833 hectares Guinea
2020s 108,950 hectares 92,500 hectares 16,450 hectares Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Guinea or Israel?
Guinea, at 111,450 hectares against 100,000 hectares in Israel as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Guinea and Israel?
11,450 hectares, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Israel?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Guinea and Israel rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Guinea ranks 104th and Israel ranks 105th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Israel: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/guinea/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/guinea/israel/">Guinea vs Israel: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed