Guinea vs Norway: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Guinea
111,450 hectares
in 2025
Norway
113,110 hectares
in 2025
Guinea rank
104th
Norway rank
102nd

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Guinea
  • Norway
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k199020072025

How they compare

Norway currently reports 113,110 hectares against 111,450 hectares in Guinea, a difference of 1,660 hectares.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 104th and Norway ranks 102nd of 185 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 53,755 hectares 115,540 hectares 61,785 hectares Norway
2000s 74,855 hectares 115,540 hectares 40,685 hectares Norway
2010s 95,733 hectares 113,884 hectares 18,151 hectares Norway
2020s 108,950 hectares 113,110 hectares 4,160 hectares Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Guinea or Norway?
Norway, at 113,110 hectares against 111,450 hectares in Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Guinea and Norway?
1,660 hectares, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Norway?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Guinea and Norway rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Guinea ranks 104th and Norway ranks 102nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Norway: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/guinea/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/guinea/norway/">Guinea vs Norway: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed