Iceland vs Samoa: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Iceland
49,470 hectares
in 2025
Samoa
46,180 hectares
in 2025
Iceland rank
119th
Samoa rank
122nd

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Iceland
  • Samoa
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199020072025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 49,470 hectares against 46,180 hectares in Samoa, a difference of 3,290 hectares.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Samoa ahead.

Iceland ranks 119th and Samoa ranks 122nd of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Samoa Difference Ahead
1990s 13,657 hectares 50,182 hectares 36,524 hectares Samoa
2000s 28,520 hectares 48,852 hectares 20,331 hectares Samoa
2010s 41,010 hectares 47,530 hectares 6,520 hectares Samoa
2020s 47,170 hectares 46,500 hectares 670 hectares Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Iceland or Samoa?
Iceland, at 49,470 hectares against 46,180 hectares in Samoa as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Iceland and Samoa?
3,290 hectares, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Samoa?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Samoa rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Iceland ranks 119th and Samoa ranks 122nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Samoa: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/iceland/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/iceland/samoa/">Iceland vs Samoa: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed