Israel vs Norway: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Israel
100,000 hectares
in 2025
Norway
113,110 hectares
in 2025
Israel rank
105th
Norway rank
102nd
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Israel
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 113,110 hectares against 100,000 hectares in Israel, a difference of 13,110 hectares.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 105th and Norway ranks 102nd of 185 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 75,900 hectares | 115,540 hectares | 39,640 hectares | Norway |
| 2000s | 88,000 hectares | 115,540 hectares | 27,540 hectares | Norway |
| 2010s | 87,900 hectares | 113,884 hectares | 25,984 hectares | Norway |
| 2020s | 92,500 hectares | 113,110 hectares | 20,610 hectares | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Israel or Norway?
- Norway, at 113,110 hectares against 100,000 hectares in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Israel and Norway?
- 13,110 hectares, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Norway?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Norway rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Israel ranks 105th and Norway ranks 102nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.