Kenya vs Tunisia: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Kenya
152,700 hectares
in 2025
Tunisia
150,720 hectares
in 2025
Kenya rank
88th
Tunisia rank
89th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Kenya
- Tunisia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 152,700 hectares against 150,720 hectares in Tunisia, a difference of 1,980 hectares.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 88th and Tunisia ranks 89th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 152,700 hectares | 88,966 hectares | 63,734 hectares | Kenya |
| 2000s | 152,700 hectares | 127,610 hectares | 25,090 hectares | Kenya |
| 2010s | 152,700 hectares | 156,549 hectares | 3,849 hectares | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 152,700 hectares | 154,100 hectares | 1,400 hectares | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Kenya or Tunisia?
- Kenya, at 152,700 hectares against 150,720 hectares in Tunisia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Kenya and Tunisia?
- 1,980 hectares, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Tunisia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Kenya and Tunisia rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Kenya ranks 88th and Tunisia ranks 89th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.